Saturday, 17 October 2026

BLAINE REED METEORITES- LIST #290 -bigger things from Denver 15OCT2026

Blaine Reed Meteorites
P.O. Box 1141, Delta, CO 81416
Ph/fax (970) 874-1487
brmeteorites@yahoo.com

LIST 290 - October 15, 2026

Dear Collectors,
Here is an offering of the larger items I had for (consignments) or brought home (bought at the show) from Denver last month. These are all one of kind items and I don’t have easy replacements for any of these (though I do have other Canyon Diablos – wire brushed and mostly smaller and I do have other pallasite frames).



CANYON DIABLO, Arizona: Coarse octahedrite (IAB). Found 1891.
Actually, this is a piece I have owned for years. I only got it back right before the Denver show. I had it out in Denver but it was in something of a hidden spot (or it likely would have sold at the show). Now that I am in a convention center/ ballroom space, I don’t have walls to hang things on or lean things against. I ended up making something of my own to make a quasi-wall. Actually, I made it from 3 shelf units I bought at Hobby Lobby and modified somewhat (added a back board so things could not simply fall out the back). I anchored these to a table with C-clamps. This gave me shelves to put things on (framed pieces, rikers, slices…) as well as (the center unit) cubby-holes to put things in. this piece was in one of the bottom cubbyholes where it was somewhat hidden by the display case in front of the shelf units. This is a wonderful completely natural piece as found. It has nice thumb-printing and is not scaly or covered in caliche like many natural pieces of this meteorite are. It was the display/ education piece at the local metal detector shop for years. It was used to show people (who endlessly brought it magnetite and hematite thinking it was meteorite) that iron meteorites as found in nature are rusty orange/brown NOT shiny gray/black. The owner has decided that he is aiming for retirement and has been giving me back much of the material I had on sale and display there. For now, he has kept a small display (maybe ¼ of the space of what was being used for the meteorites) that does not have room for things that are just display (I was not trying to sell this one – I wanted to keep it there for this education purpose). So, here is a nice, natural piece that has lost it place/purpose where I had it. I have a similar piece for my own display/ education purposes and I don’t really need two, so this one is now available.
433.8 gram natural individual – 75mm x 60mm x 25mm - $800

DRONINIO, Russia: Ni-poor ataxite (ungrouped). Found July 2000.
This is a wonderful complete slice that I did get in Denver. It is not etched, just highly polished on one side (the back side still shows the saw marks. The guy that cut this told me he had close to 30 hours in cutting and polishing this as it is already and didn’t see the need to spend another 12 or 15 polishing out the back side). I knew that this meteorite had troilite blebs all through it (it is its signature feature) but I have not seen ones like the ones in this slice. I could spend a lot of time just looking at these inclusions. There are all kinds of interesting ones. Some are basically a ring – a metal center with a ring of sulfide around it. Some are horseshoe shaped. There is even one that looks like a flower. It is basically round (about 7mm diameter) but has metal blebs inside that look a lot like flower petals. A nice museum quality slice of a rare meteorite type.
981.9 gram complete slice – 245mm x 115mm x 75mm - $1700

LIBYAN DESERT GLASS:
I believed this to be just a nice large, really clear (particularly for its size) Libyan Glass specimen. Looking at it out in full sunlight (it is really nice there) I noticed something. It had a tunnel of dirt/ sand grains that looked like it went all the way through it. As in all the way through the center of it, not just a corner or edge. Yep, a little work with a copper wire and the dirt came out and showed that there is indeed a tunnel all the way through this piece. Right now, I have a wire (supposed to be red but looks more pink – a leftover from some electrical work I did around here) that goes through the hole to show it is there, complete and not tiny. This piece has another interesting feature. It is loaded with little (1 or 2mm sized) white balls. I have been told (years ago) that these are made up of the high temp/ high shock quartz mineral called cristobalite. There is a small chipped area on the bottom of this piece that acts as a window allowing you to see clearly into it (the rest of it is the usual sculpted/ textured wind eroded surfaces found on this material naturally). There are a number of these cristobalite balls right there for easy viewing.
787 gram with hole completely through it – 120mm x 90mm x 70mm - $1100



NWA (unstudied): HED achondrite (Eucrite).
This is a stone that I got from Tim Stephan, Fredric’s brother, at the show. I almost sold it there too (it was in a visible spot on/in my “cubbyhole” shelf). Fredric had planned to do the research work and publish this but never got it done. We (Tim and I) have no idea where/ who he got it from, just that it is a really nice display specimen (I know it is HED because I ran the XRF on it). This has a nice large cut and polished face (80mm x 70mm) that has a very Moon-rock look to it (clasts that are black to bright white in color in a dark gray matrix). I suspect that Fredric got the specimen with this face already cut on it. There is another cut spot (on the bottom. 40mm x 30mm) that clearly was made with a smaller saw. This was likely where Fredric removed a specimen for the research work (we have not found that). This is really nice HED moon rock lookalike at a great price.
1666.6 gram individual with cut face – 120mm x 90mm x 80mm - $2500

NWA (unstudied): Achondrite (Ureilite).
This is another specimen that I got from Tim that belonged to Fredric. Like the specimen above, this one has two cut faces. Like the piece above, the larger one (70mm x 30mm) is polished and the smaller one (26mm x 15mm) on the back is not. I didn’t run this one on the XRF as it is pretty obvious that this IS a Ureilte. I see that from the “polished” face being not completely polished (there are some saw marks still visible) and the smaller cut face shows the saw that was used had considerable difficulties making even that cut. These things tell me that this is a tougher than nails stone. It is NOT one of the soft uereilites (I have only ever run into two of those). Though this stone is a great shape for cutting (it would produce lots of nice complete slices) I would recommend against doing that. Not sure if this is one of the super hard Ureilites (with diamonds) or merely one of the really hard ones (with silicon carbides). Regardless, it is clear that this would likely eat up LOTS of saw blades and sandpaper in preparing it. The other reason to not cut this is that this has a huge area of actual primary fusion crust! I have only seen actual fusion crust on a few ureilites (they rarely have it for some reason) and even then it is usually a thin almost more imagination than anything secondary crust. This is a wonderful specimen as it is and, if I were going to keep it, would leave it alone.
1100.4 gram stone with crust and cut face – 110mm x 90mm x 50mm - $3500







SEYMCHAN, Russia: Stony-iron (Pallasite). Found 1967.
I am starting to see that I am going to have serious troubles getting pieces like this in the future. I had trouble getting it in Denver (where I usually get my Seymchan pallasite slices). Part of it is that they people I like to deal with were always closed when I was not stuck in my “new ballroom space” but also, they did not have many pieces to choose from. In addition to that, the prices on this material looks to be going up rapidly. I did get some pieces near (but not at) prices I was used to, but not much. The other sources (one was right outside the doors to the convention center sub-room I was in) had nice material BUT the prices blew me away. This particular slice I got, partly because it was the only largish (more than 50 or 60 grams) piece with nice, clear olivines I could even remotely afford. It has less olivine than many pallasites (but shows some great widmanstatten structure because of that) but those crystals are some of the clearest I have ever seen in Seymchan. Pretty much all of the olivines pass light, most amazingly so. This is a full slice that I have put in one of my custom made frames (those proved to be super popular at the show – the reason I needed to hunt down material to make more with). I did have to pay more than I am used to too get this piece BUT A) it is a really good piece and B) all the other sources with similar material were at $20/g my cost (!!!). Those people were at $25/g for pieces with more “normal” pallasite olivine amounts (clear crystals or not). I suspect that this is telling me that this might be one of the last really nice Seymchan slices I can afford to frame, unfortunately.
325.2 gram complete slice in frame – 170mm x 150mm x 2mm - $5100




TOLUCA, Mexico: Medium octahedrite (IAB). Found 1776.
Along with the US, this is having its 250th anniversary. This is a really nice piece for Toluca. It is likely an earlier surface find. It has nice solid hard surfaces, not the usually rather ratty/ scaly surfaces I have seen on so many Tolucas. This was sent home with me to figure out what it was. It came to a mineral dealer from someone selling a mineral collection. No one knew what this thing was (other than it was a meteorite). My initial thought was Canyon Diablo, but it didn’t look quite right for that. Looking at it a bit more, Toluca came to mind. These used to be commonly available but it has been so long (like 30or 40 years) that Toluca did not pop up as a possibility at first. I did come to that conclusion after a bit though. However, people were not happy with just a guess. This was sent home with me to polish a spot on an end and etch it. Yep, did that, and the etch worked (surprising for me – I generally suck at etching for some reason). So, here is a really nice piece of a famous meteorite that is not so commonly seen anymore.
4783.5 gram individual – 185mm x 115mm x 75mm - $3600

OVERSEAS/ Out of US Orders:
This year has brought about a number of changes (in addition to large price increases) for things leaving the US. One thing I have run into is that I am being forced to pay Duties and Taxes on some/ many orders I am sending out. So far, I have NOT been able to find anywhere where I can learn which orders I will have to pre-pay taxes on and which ones I will not. To be honest, I have not had to send very many out of US orders lately so I have a very limited understanding of this new problem. I did have to pre-pay these things on two orders going to Germany (losing any and all profits on those sales as a result). I just sent out a large, fairly valuable package to Switzerland and did NOT have to pre-pay (thankfully, I suspect it would have been close over $600 if I did). I also did not have to pre-pay on a small order I sent to Canada. Right now, I have no way of knowing IF I am going to have to do this and/ or how much it will cost. Despite the system demanding the value, the type items and more when I do a “calculate a price” on the PO website ahead of time I got no information on this. When I go to actually make the shipping label, I get NO info on the Duties and taxes until AFTER I have entered my credit card info to pay for what I thought would be JUST the shipping. The last package to Germany, the shipping part was $21.80. No big deal. However, after “agreeing” to the cost and entering my credit card info to pay for it, I got a notice of pre-payment of Duties and Taxes was required. That cost me $85. No way around it. Pay those or loose the $21.80shipping cost (it looks like the system has already charged me that before I find out about the duties and taxes thing) as well as the entire sale (who wants to pay for an order that cannot be shipped?). Of course, once I got tagged for those fees, I have not been able to recover them from the customers (they are somewhat correct in saying it was I who misquoted the actual shipping costs so it is my problem if I lose money on it).

Anyway, I cannot go on and keep losing money sending things overseas like this. I will try to see if I can find some way to get those tax numbers ahead of time (before I have made the shipping label, given my CC info and “agreed to pay all expenses”) so I can give an actual accurate quote ahead of time. IF I am not able to do that, then I will likely have to say that those extra expenses may be roughly 25% of the overall package value (this seems to be about the amount that I have seen on the few overseas things I have sent this year). As such, a $200 may end up having around $50 of duties and taxes on it. I think what I will need to do is NOT run a charge on a customer’s card until after I have created the shipping label and found out exactly what those taxes will be (IF there are any on their package that is). Then I can put that amount on the actual receipt in the package with the specimens (clearly labeled as duties and taxes already paid). This will likely be helpful for the customer as well as it will help show that those things have already been paid. Disturbingly, nowhere on the shipping papers that are produced for these orders can I find ANYWHERE that clearly says this and how much those expenses were and that they have been already paid! My “receipt” for the shipping shows ONLY the actual package shipping costs. On the two going to Germany (where I was charged these fees) nowhere in/ on the post office system could I get something that clearly stated the duties/ taxes paid – ONLY the raw shipping costs (I could only find a small note that $106.80 had been charged to my card by the system for that last package). Having it on the receipt AND a matching credit card charge receipt would certainly help in showing that the package has already been paid and should go to the customer without any further charges.

NO, I WILL NOT LIE ABOUT THE VALUE OF THE PACKAGE TO GET AROUND THIS!!
Yes, at one time that kind of thing would work (but was still highly illegal and could land someone in jail for a considerable amount of time. I am not interested in going to jail for years so someone can save a few dollars on taxes). Not anymore. Customs now regularly uses AI. They can simply take a picture of an item and know what it is and what it is worth. I had someone overseas wanting me to claim a $2500 pallasite slice in a custom frame was worth less than $500. No dice I told them, AI will expose that lie in a heartbeat. To prove my point, I showed them (told them anyway) how I had simply taken a picture of the slice in Google Lens and the associated AI not only figured out that it was a pallasite but WHICH ONE and how much it really sells for! What has been happening lately is customs simply enters my name, enters the things listed on the customs declaration and BOOM, they have my actual offering - showing what I really charged for the item(s) - in front of them in seconds. They see a declared value of $15on on item that is on that offering priced at $350 – game over. Those things WILL be confiscated and someone (me) is going to have a heap of legal troubles.

Shipping:
US Shipping:

Rates continue to change. When shipping things from my last offering, I have seen rates increase yet again. I’ll hold to $8 for my usual jewelry box in a padded envelope (even though it now looks like it is closer to $8.50 minimum for those now). Small Priority flat-rate boxes are now $13 (IF I take the time to do the label on line- somewhat of a lesson in frustration and many times does not work at all, otherwise it is $15). Medium flat-rate boxes are $22 ($26 if I can’t get the label made online). One thing I have noticed though is that does NOT seem to be the huge penalty there once was for using your own box. Lately, I have been able to send my own boxes quite a bit cheaper than if I used an appropriate sized flat-rate box. Of course, this is when sending “Ground Advantage”. I can use my own boxes for Priority shipping (and do when I have something to big for a small flat-rate but using a medium would require a stupid amount of packing material). Those costs don’t seem out of line anymore like they once were.

Overseas/ out of US:
The packages I have sent (and almost sent before duties and tax issues – see not at top of this offering – killed the sale) seem to indicate that my usual couple ounce jewelry box in a padded envelope is around $25. Priority small flat-rate is $56 and a medium is $93. However, you need to keep in mind that duties and taxes are likely to be around 25% of the package value if you are in one of the places that requires these to be repaid. This is added to the shipping when I go to make the label and, so far, I have NOT found a work-around. I have not even found where I can find what those will be until AFTER I have created (and paid for?) the actual shipping label. Regardless, I will NOT charge anyone more than the actual amount after I know what it will be.

Friday, 25 September 2026

BLAINE REED METEORITES- LIST #289 recently mailed offering 24SEP2026

Blaine Reed Meteorites
P.O. Box 1141, Delta, CO 81416
Ph/fax (970) 874-1487
brmeteorites@yahoo.com
LIST 289 - September 24, 2026

Dear Collectors
This is only my second list of the year. I skipped the one I would usually have done in March or April. Partly because I was traveling and partly because I simply fell so far behind that I lacked material prepared and ready to go onto a list back at that point. I have had some difficulties lately getting material that is affordable (reasonably priced anyway) in quantities that these offerings require and not go bankrupt getting it. Trying to get things that are interesting types or names that I have not offered in the past is more difficult yet. Don’t even ask about new falls. Those start at $hundreds/ gram typically.

One thing I had completely forgotten about when I made up the mailed version of this offering (already in the mail with several people already having it) is that in a few weeks, I will have been doing this for 40 years now! I had planned on "starting business" in January of 1987. However, back in those times you had to take out magazine ads (no internet) and wait. not knowing much about how the magazine world worked, i took out ads for the December issues of Rock and Gem and Lapidary Journal.I assumed those would come out in December. I would have to mail catalogs (yes, paper in an envelope) to anyone that requested one. i figured it would be some time (week or two) before any of those would produce a sale. Nope, I got a call (and my phone number was not even in the ad) from someone in Erie, PA asking for a catalog in earlyish/ mid October. Somehow he had gotten his December Rock and Gem magazine in early October. He got the catalog and placed an order a few days later. So, my first sales were around the third week of October in 1987 (gads, I am starting to feel old remembering all of that so long ago).

A note concerning the photos in this offering:
I want everyone receiving this post with embedded group photos of the items on this list that the item pictured MAY NOT be the identical item you receive (except for cases where I have clearly labeled an item as “the only one this size” or similar). I usually have (and sell) multiple pieces of each size of the items listed (sometimes MANY of them – far to many to put all in a photograph for people to pick from). What I normally do is send the first person that asks for a particular item the largest piece available in whatever size range it is that the specimen they are buying belongs to (when I send a piece that is not in the photo, you generally get a very similar but slightly larger piece). This came about as MOST of my sales from these periodic larger catalogs come from the paper mailed version of this offering where no photos exist so customers don’t know exactly what the piece they ordered looks like (and are usually quite happy to receive a slightly larger specimen instead). So, you can certainly request the exact item in the group photo and I am happy to send it if someone else hasn’t already requested it. Please let me know if you would likely ONLY be happy with receiving that actual pictured piece(s) and I will NOT do any substitution(s) in your order.




CANYON DIABLO, Arizona; Coarse octahedrite (IAB). Found 1891.
I have not been able to get any of this for a few years now. This year, I have fallen into a fair amount of it. However, much of it is pieces that are not particularly pretty but are particularly cheap. In fact, the prices I have on these are likely around the prices I had on Canyon Diablos more than 20 years ago. The owner/ seller of these did not like them. I have to admit, they were pretty ratty. They certainly had a fair amount of rust scaling and attached caliche. I did some serious work on these. First, I removed the caliche WITHOUT using acid. I then put these in a neutralizing solution for a while, rinsed with distilled water and then dried them in the sun on a 100+ degree day (I had to wear gloves to pick them up after that). I then wire brushed the heck out of them. Actually, they turned out pretty nice! They do show some layering and cracks but, for the most part, they are not all that different than many I have in my “regular” Canyon Diablo pile. Anyway, here is a chance to own a paperweight sized (or pocket piece) Canyon Diablo at a decades ago price.
1) Cleaned natural fragments:
a) 29.8 grams - 25mm x 15mm x 15mm - $20
b) 73.6 grams - 40mm x 30mm x 12mm - $45
c) 137.9 grams - 57mm x 42mm x 15mm - $80
d) 202.2 grams - 80mm x 30mm x 20mm - $110
e) 410.8 grams - 60mm x 50mm x 30mm - $205
f) 564.7 grams - 73mm x 50mm x 35mm - $250 – only piece this size.



NWA 18012: Ordinary chondrite (L5). Found 2025. Tkw = 43.27kg.
I got this stuff this last Tucson. A friend and I shared the lot. He got the far bigger portion. These were all angular fragments likely resulting from hitting rocks during the fall or freeze/thaw action later. I took some (a bunch, actually) time to cut most of those into nice end pieces. Thought this is listed as a “W3” weathering, it is surprisingly fresh. It actually looks a LOT like the Quitovac, Mexico I had a few years ago. This shows some light colored (some of which are fairly large) chondrules, lots of fresh metal and sulfides in a mottled light tan (nearly white) with orange and brown spots scattered throughout matrix. Nice and very affordable example of a fresh stone meteorite to carry around to show people what a meteorite looks like or to just have. I have these priced below what they would be if they were in one of my “unknown” NWA buckets.
1) Cut fragments/ end pieces:
a) 19.0 grams - 40mm x 28mm x 10mm - $9
b) 34.1 grams - 46mm x 28mm x 12mm - $15
c) 50.5 grams - 55mm x 35mm x 16mm - $20
d) 74.6 grams - 60mm x 45mm x 15mm - $30
e) 112.3 grams - 80mm x 45mm x 15mm - $40




WILUNA, Australia: Ordinary chondrite (H5). Fell Sept. 2, 1967. Tkw = about 150kg.
It has been a loooong time since I had enough of this to put on a list. So long in fact that I had completely lost my information cards for this meteorite (I had to make new ones). This fall formed a strewn field that was about 4 miles long and about 2 miles wide running in a NW to SE direction. Pieces found ranged from a couple grams to 10kg. I got a handful (NOT a large handful) of these wonderful little pieces back in April. These are all nice complete little individuals as found. I can see only a few tiny areas of secondary crust on a couple of these. The crust on all is thick and fresh (ranging from deep dark chocolate brown to black). It is clear that these pieces were not picked up long after the fall. Each of these is in its own gemstone display holder.
1) Complete individuals as found:
a) 3.3 grams - 15mm x 13mm x 8mm - $65
b) 5.0 grams - 18mm x 15mm x 11mm - $95
c) 6.4 grams - 18mm x 12mm x 12mm - $120
d) 8.2 grams - 24mm x 15mm x 13mm - $150
e) 10.3 grams - 21mm x 18mm x 15mm - $185



FEZZOU 002, Morocco: Achondrite (Angrite).Found 2023. Tkw = 12.37kg.
This stone was found broken into two pieces, each with black vesicular crust. Angrites are one of the very rarest of meteorite by total known weight of its type of all known specimens in existence. They represent some of the very oldest rocks in the solar system, having crystalized as long as 4.564billion years ago, only 2my to 4my after the formation of the calcium aluminum inclusions found in other meteorites (best shown in CV3 types). They are likely from along ago destroyed body that was somewhere in size between the Moon and Mars. These are all part slices broken from a larger complete slice I picked up in Denver last year.
1) Part slices:
a) .9grams - 14mm x 10mm x 2mm - $55
b) 1.7 grams - 15mm x 15mm x 2mm - $100
c) 3.6 grams - 30mm x 17mm x 2mm - $205
d) 7.1 grams - 37mm x 26mm x 2mm - $395
e) 13.3 grams - 50mm x 40mm x 2mm - $725
f) 25.0 grams - 70mm x 56mm x 2mm - $1250




ADRAR 017, Algeria: Lunar (Troctolitic anorthosite). Found 2025. Tkw = 18.2kg.
I don’t normally like to put two achondrites on an offering at one time. It is just that I skipped my “Spring list” and had two very important/ special things to offer (this and the Angrite above). Troctolites are a subsurface cooled rock type that consists of olivine, Ca-rich plagioclase and minor pyroxenes. This is a Lunar rock type that I have never had (well, enough of to offer on a mailed list anyway). To be honest, these don’t look all that different from many anorthositic breccias but they are a different rock type. Obtaining this material is what (finally) allowed me to have a nice piece of this type in my collection. I don’t have a lot of this but enough that many of you should now be able to have a piece in your collection as well. At the time I typed this, there were only a total of 17 lunar troctolites recorded in the world (all be it, a couple of them were quite large). Most of these, I will put in a small plastic display box (the ones that fit anyway) when I send them out.
1) Slices/ part slices:
a) .45 grams - 8mm x 8mm x 3mm - $40
b) .96 grams - 18mm x 7mm x 3mm - $85
c) 1.78 grams - 17mm x 14mm x 3mm - $150
d) 3.08 grams - 23mm x 20mm x 3mm - $250 - not piece in photo.
e) 5.79 grams - 40mm x 23mm x 3mm - $450




PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS:
This is a really cool thing a friend showed me in Tucson. It is a table of (mostly) REAL element bits (some are compounds as some are too dangerous to play around with in their pure state) sealed in a lucite slab. I collect elements and have a pretty good larger collection (though I am very shy on Ruthenium and Osmium) and most of these do look real. I got these right after Tucson and then tried to get more later. I saw that some were now completely missing some elements (like gold, but then, at that particular moment, hold was around $5500/ ounce). And some of these, despite being listed as “real elements in lucite” were really just painted pictures of the elements on the back of the lucite. Of course, those I returned and have not bought any since. I have two sizes. I have several of the smaller but only one of the larger. Given the problems I had with the last ones I tried to purchase, I am not inclined to try and order more for now.
1) Small - 150mm x 115mm x 20mm - $60
2) Large – 200mm x 125mm x 25mm - $100


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shipping:
US Shipping: Well, the post office has been raising prices at a faster rate lately. My small specimen in a small jewelry box in a padded envelope now costs me at least $8 now! And that is for “ground Advantage”. A small priority flat-rate box is now a bit over $12, medium closer to $22. Some of the things on here (thinking the bigger Canyon Diablo pieces here) I’ll probably have to custom quote. However, I have not seen such huge penalties I saw in the past when I have used my own boxes lately.

Overseas shipping: This has changed a lot lately. And, yes, prices are way higher than just a few months ago. The few overseas packages I have sent lately tell me that the usual jewelry box in a padded envelope going ‘First-class” is close to $25 now. A small priority flat-rate box is around $55 to $60 (!!!). However, the bigger change is that I now have to pay all VAT, Duties and other taxes upfront when I send something out of the country. This cost me $40 on a recent shipment. I quoted the postage and the customer paid. I go to make the shipping label and I get billed the VAT and duties – another $39. Nowhere did I see these charges shown or labeled UNTIL I went to “check out” (pay for the shipping). I will, obviously, have to custom quote ALL out of US shipments now. I just hope there is some way for me to see the VAT taxes BEFORE I quote the shipping.

Thursday, 20 August 2026

BLAINE REED METEORITES- LIST 288 A Few Small Things and Denver Show Info 18AUG2026

Blaine Reed Meteorites
P.O. Box 1141, Delta, CO 81416
Ph/fax (970) 874-1487
brmeteorites@yahoo.com

LIST 288 - August 18, 2026

Dear Collectors

DENVER SHOW INFO:
I will be in the same hotel as last year (Delta Hotels by Mariott. 10E120th Ave., Northglenn, CO 80233 for those of you that will be using GPS). As mentioned above, I will NOT be in one of the regular hotel rooms. I will be downstairs in the convention center level (the hotel and rooms are a floor above this). I don’t have an easy way to describe where I am in this venue. The best description I can give is I will be close to the south end of the sub-room that is on the east end of the convention center.

The dates (and times – I will NOT be able to stay open late like I usually do in this spot) are different this year. The show has been shortened substantially this year (smartly, in my opinion). The Hardrock (where the original classic Denver Mineral club show with the fantastic museum quality displays sets up) has moved to be the first weekend of the once longer show. The original timing used to work great. We had the serious early bird people show up the first weekend. Things got a little slow mid next week but then had a whole new set of people coming into town for the club, museum display show. Nope, now there is nothing to bring in new people. Last year showed that extra days did nothing but cost us extra dollars. We also will be opening what would seem an odd day – Wednesday. This is because there is a small show right across the street from us that opens that same day. It is not a big show but it certainly brings people interested in our kind of things (and those people were somewhat frustrated to find out that we would not be opening for several days yet when they wanted to visit our show last year).

The dates are: September 9th through September 14th. The times the convention center will be open are from 10Am to 6pm with closing on the 14th day being 4pm (we need to have everything packed up and out that night I believe).


Click on image to enlarge.

CARANCAS, Peru: Ordinary chondrite (H4-5). Fell September 15, 2007.
I personally think there must still be a really big piece of this in the ground down there. I cannot imagine how something that supposedly turned into small fragments and dust could have left such a big and deep hole in the ground. I know, when Chelyabinsk fell, everyone was saying that a pressure wave and some dust (all that was found on the surface) was what created a big hole through thick ice on a lake. Nope, they indeed did find a big Chelaybinsk piece buried in the bottom of the lake. I suspect that a similar big piece of Carancas exists – it just would be really hard to try and find out (the area has a really high water table so the impact pit rapidly turned into a small lake). Anyway, this is just a typical little fragment picked up shortly after the fall. It is in a nice 80mm x 60mm x 25mm plastic display box that has a picture of the crater and an ELKK Meteorites label.
.14g – 8mm x 6mm x 3mm - $40

NWA 4502: Carbonaceous chondrite. (CV3). Found 2005. Tkw = 100kg.
This one does not have a label (just a printout of part of its Meteoritical Bulletin listing) but I know it is correct. I have some pieces of this meteorite myself in inventory (this one, like the other things on this list came from Fredric Stephan). This was a complete little individual that has been cut in half. I would have cut it to get the largest surface area, but this one has been cut the other direction. None the less, it still shows the classic colors (tan, orangish/ red) chondrules of this particular CV3 find. This comes in a 40mm round gemstone type display holder.
12.8 gram end piece – 23mm x 15mm x 15mm - $75

NWA 5885: Enstatite achondrite (Aubrite). Found 2009. Tkw = 98grams.
This one is in a 55mm x 35mm x 15mm plastic display box and has an A. Bates Meteorite Collection label with it. This label has the wrong classification on it. IF it had been right, I’d probably put this one in my micro collection. The label has it as “EH5”. There are only a couple of those out there. The Meteortical Bulletin has this as “Aubrite”. Yep, that I believe. This certainly looks much more like an Aubrite (all be it one that has turned somewhat orangish brown from weathering). I remember seeing some identical material to this years ago. It was not much to look at and it was quite expensive (it was one of the first Aubrites from the NWA area that made it to collectors).
.45gram slice – 18mm x 8mm x 2mm - $25

NWA 5886: Enstatite chondrite (EL6). Found 2008. Tkw = 11grams.
Not sure I entirely believe the total known weight on this or not. This is a nice thin slice with a good surface area. IF there was only 11 grams of this, it must have been something of an angular somewhat thin fragment. This is certainly a possibility. It has been my experience that E chondrites often do like to weather apart into layers. My other thought is that this is actually a piece of the Al Hoggounia (001) stuff (that was classified by some as an EL6/7 and others as an EL3(!!!). This is very light gray, almost white with only a little brown staining around the edges. IF this is some of the Al Hoggounia it is one of the pieces that everyone said was “Fresh”. Nope. Actually something weird has happened to some the material that was found in the remains of an ancient lake. The lake waters had some kind of chemistry (phosphoric acid like maybe?) that leached out iron oxides making the stuff effected that way look fresh. Looking closely (with a loupe) this does look different than what you’d expect an enstatite chondrite to look. This has a lot of porosity to it – tons of small vesicles scattered uniformly throughout (where metal was, got oxidized and then leached out maybe?). Regardless, I am sure someone is going to want this as it is a substantial amount of an NWA # that likely few people will ever have. This comes in a plastic display box and an A. Bates label.
1.62gram slice – 20mm x 19mm x 2mm - $45

NWA 7510: HED Achondrite (Howardite). Found 2012. Tkw = 196 grams.
This one is in a plastic display box. It was in there such that the natural side was up. I switched it so the cut side (clearly showing that this is a howardite) is now up. The “backside” of this is actually really nice. It is wind-polished but has a nice medium brown fusion crust covering it. This comes with an A. Bates label.
.56gram end piece – 15mm x 11mm x 4mm - $25

NWA 8781: Carbonaceous chondrite, ungrouped. Found 2014. Tkw = 380grams.
This, to me, is probably the most interesting thing here. I have had very few “ungrouped” carbonaceous chondrites go through my hands and I am fairly certain I have not had a piece of this one before. This kind of looks like a cross between a CV type (some larger chondrules visible) and a CM type (dark background). From what little I was able to find, I saw something that said this looks like it might be related to the (quite new) CT carbonaceous group. This is a nice little part slice that has wind-polished fusion crust along about 1/3 of its edges. This comes in a plastic display box. No label but came with a copy of the important part of its Meteoritical Bulletin listing.
.25 gram slice – 10mm x 8mm x 2mm - $70


Shipping:

USA-
Rates continue to change faster that I can even get used to those already increased just months ago. Right now, it looks like $8 will cover my usual specimen in a jewelry box in a padded envelope. Most of the specimens listed here would be fine going that way. However, if you want “Priority” (and the slightly larger Carancas specimen might be better this way as it is too large for a jewelry box) that is now $12.

OVERSEAS-
This is also changing rapidly. I just mailed a package to Germany and was surprised by the costs and changes. First, the costs. That shipment, a jewelry box and padded envelope thing was something like $25. A small flat-rate priority box would have been closer to $56. The real surprise came when I went to “check out”. Another $38 was automatically added to the cost. It seems that I now must prepay all VAT, duties and taxes. The system tells me what those are going to be but did not clearly say that I WILL be paying those before the package is accepted for shipping (those extra "fees" were added onto the bill when I went to "check out"). As such, regardless of how I ship something, I will have to custom quote ALL out of US orders (I am hoping the system will actually allow me to see what the taxes and duties will be WITHOUT needing to create and pay for a shipping label first).

Thursday, 16 July 2026

BLAINE REED METEORITES- LIST 287 16JUL2026 - LARGE EUCRITES

Blaine Reed Meteorites
P.O. Box 1141, Delta, CO 81416
Ph/fax (970) 874-1487
brmeteorites@yahoo.com

LIST 287 - July 16, 2026

Dear Collectors,
Once again, it has been a considerable time since I sent out any kind of offering. Somehow, I have been all tied up with all kinds of things this summer and the meteorites have gotten ignored. I am trying to fix that. I am now taking and processing my own photos (I pretty much forced Blake to work with me and the device I am using as the camera to show me how to do all of this. I did it such that I had to do all the actual moves. Simply doing it for me while I am not able to even see what is being done does not help or “teach” anything). So, unless the so called camera (actually a “smart” phone that Linda only bought to get the minutes off of) or the computer I am using go on the fritz, I should be able to get photos taken and sent for all kinds of things MUCH faster now. Please let me know if I am screwing something up in these photos. I don’t have any plans to be a master photographer but I don’t want to send out trash that is barely visible either.

I have always like Vesta material. (Yeah, I know, these things look like they are from Vesta but we cannot fully prove which if any of our HED meteorites really are from that asteroid). Aside from the Moon and Mars, it is the only source for some of our meteorites we can point to in the sky (yes, you have to be in a really dark area and really know your way around the sky and where to look to see it. Something I have only been able to accomplish once). The other thing was that these things are priced at what I get for ordinary chondrites! Granted, the NWA one here is closer to what I sell my nicer ordinary chondrites for BUT this is an achondrite likely from a known source! Too good to leave in storage so into the car they went. So, IF you have ever wanted to truly substantial hunk of Vesta (beyond paperweight, well into the door stop and wheel chock for a truck size) here is a great chance. I, personally am hoping to end up with one of the two largest pieces here (I figure I’d let fate decide. I aim for which ever does not sell first).


-click on image to enlarge


-click on image to enlarge

JIKHARRA  001, Libya: HED achondrite (Eucrite, melt breccia). Found 2022. Tkw = about 3 tons.
This is, by far, the largest HED recovery of any type. Thankfully, the price fully reflects that. Actually, it may be a bit under. I know this material was everywhere a few years ago but the vast majority of it seems to have already found homes. There does not seem to be pieces of this everywhere anymore. As such, I suspect that the price of this will start to go up before terribly long. I bought a 6+kg piece of this when it came out for more than I am selling these for (but was happy to get it) now I am hoping to upgrade to either the 14.6kg or 24.16kg one (I have already sold the 6kg stone). I think this is probably my best chance to have a struggle a bit to move piece of HED. These particular stones are all complete as found. They are mostly wind-polished but they do still show some patches of nice fusion crust.

1) Complete individuals as found:
a) 1001 grams – 100mm x 85mm x 60mm - $400
b) 2652 grams – 150mm x 110mm x 70mm - $1000
c) 3853 grams – 190mm x 110mm x 100mm - $1400
d) 14,620 grams – 260mm x 200mm x 150mm - $4600
e) 24,260grams – 370mm x 270mm x 150mm - $7500



-click on image to enlarge

NWA 17604, HED achondrite (Eucrite, melt breccia). Found 2023. Tkw = 24.3kg.
This is a bit more expensive but it is actually more interesting material. First, this is clearly a breccia whereas the Jikharra material is more of melt. You can clearly see the clasts inside of this on the exterior surface. I am not sure what was in these stones that burned out during the fall, but these all have nice sculpted shapes and a couple of them have really deep pits/ caves (up to 4cm or so deep on the largest stone). These also show some patches of fusion crust. Some of which is very fresh – still having the proper classic shiny black crust of a fresh eucrite fall.

1) Complete individuals as found:
a) 1016 grams – 100mm x 90mm x 60mm - $865
b) 1325 grams – 130mm x 90mm x 65mm - $1100
c) 2873 grams – 160mm x 130mm x 85mm - $2150

Shipping:
Given the sizes of these pieces, I think I will need to custom quote the shipping of any of these anywhere. I do know that a good number of them would fit in a medium flat-rate box (now $21. Yes, the post office just raised rates yet again a week or so ago). I have found that, if I am careful, I can use my own box for things and keep it as reasonable (I am NOT going to say “cheap” here) as a flat-rate box. Regardless, I’ll try to keep shipping as reasonable as I can on any of these pieces.


Thursday, 14 May 2026

BLAINE REED METEORITES- LIST 286 14MAY2026 RARE Orgueil CI1 for Sale

Orgueil, 162 years after it fell!

Blaine Reed Meteorites
P.O. Box 1141, Delta, CO 81416
Ph/fax (970) 874-1487
brmeteorites@yahoo.com

LIST 285 - May 14, 2026

Orgueil CI1
Click on image to enlarge.

ORGUEIL, France Carbonaceous chondrite (CI1). Fell May 14, 1864.
I just noticed that this is going the same day it fell, 162 years ago! As mentioned above, these samples consist of small fragments (from around small sand grain sized to a few mm sized, generally). The large lots are in glass vials. The small lots are in capsules. In the photo, I have the capsules lose, on their own. When I sell/ send any of these, I will put those capsules in a labeled magnifier box (exactly like the one that is up and to the right of the actual samples in the photo).
Fragments in either a capsule or glass vial.
CODE-
1Aa) .05 grams in a capsule - $125
1Bb) .10grams in a capsule - $250
1Cc) .25 grams in a capsule $600
1Dd) .50 grams in glass vial - $1100
1Ee) 1.0 grams in glass vial - $2200
Please specify the listing Code when contacting. 

Dear Collectors,
  This is kind of an "off the cuff" offering. I really had not planned on doing this RARE FALL offering. I got this material from Alan Lang a couple decades ago. I think he got it as part of a trade he had done with the Paris Museum some years earlier. I did sell some of this material way back, but that has to have been something like 15 years or so ago. I have had it set aside since before the European mission to land on a comet (where the landing craft ended up on its side in a canyon against a steep cliff wall such that it could not collect any data). My hope was that whatever data that landing would have collected might have shown that this material (CI1 meteorites) was likely from comets. I watched the Meteoritical Society’s magazines and bulletins to see what, if anything, the orbiting craft was able to learn about this. I don’t recall seeing much of anything being reported about any possible ties between CI1s and comets for years (it takes considerable time between data collection and/or sample returns before useful information starts getting published about it). Then I heard about the “upcoming” sample returns from carbonaceous asteroids (one through Japan and the US’s Osirus Rex mission). So, decided to set this stuff back until hearing what was learned from those. So far, I have not heard much (but then, I am not currently receiving the Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences magazines). I may be jumping the gun here and may end up wishing I had not done this offering, but here it is (and at prices equal to or a little lower than what I sold this material for when I did offer it years ago. Not that it has become less interesting scientifically or otherwise but some collectors have likely already filled the “CI1” hole in their collections with an NWA find. As such, I suspect fewer people will feel the need to have a piece of this). This offering came about from someone contacting me wanting display worthy pieces of rare or unusual meteorites with the emphasis on historics and falls. This one checks all the boxes. Well, the historic, fall and rare ones. “Larger display worthy” maybe not so much. The potential buyer did end up passing on this as all of my “samples” were indeed just crumbs/ fragments in vials or capsules. They wanted a substantial single larger piece. I, once upon a time, did have such things. I originally had a really nice 2.8gram crusted fragment. However, I ended up watching it (on its own) breaking into smaller pieces. Getting frustrated at seeing this, I ended up selling those fragments while they still had good size to them. It has been my experience that (even in a very dry climate, maybe a sealed, air-tight desiccated container would yield different results) this material does seem to be prone to making itself into exactly the kind of pieces I am offering here today.

Shipping:

US:
They have indeed raised rates again recently (this is starting to feel like a weekly thing. Hello 1970’s inflation!!). The last small package I sent (a jewelry box in padded envelope) ran me $9. The specimen was a little larger than some (and certainly larger than any piece being offered here would be) so I’ll stick to $8 for this basic shipping for now. As for priority – it looks like they have raised the rates for a small flat-rate box to a bit over $14 now (!!!). I have not shipped anything this way since the rate increase but I did have a small flat-rate box package come in from Kansas a couple days ago and noticed the shipping cost was OVER $14! So, I’ll be at $14 for small flat-rate box shipping at this point.

OVERSEAS:
It has been some time since I have sent anything out of the US. With all the hassles and paperwork these days, that us something of a blessing. At this point, anything going overseas, I will need to look up shipping costs. However, the last packages I sent out of the US were about $17 for my basic small/ cheap specimen in a padded envelope to Canada and around $25 going to Europe. For small priority flat-rate boxes I think it was around $30 to Canada and around $45 to Europe.

Monday, 4 May 2026

BLAINE REED METEORITES= LIST 285 04MAY2026

Blaine Reed Meteorites
P.O. Box 1141, Delta, CO 81416
Ph/fax (970) 874-1487
brmeteorites@yahoo.com

LIST 285 - May 4, 2026

Dear Collectors
Here is my second “consigned things brought home from Tucson” list. Like the last one, these are all consigned items that (if not sold) be going back to the owner. This will not be done for at least a couple weeks, so do try and let me know if something here interests you, even if you will not be able to take/pay for it until later (it would be much more difficult for me to try and get a specimen back into my hands later.




GUADALUPE Y CALVO, Mexico: Hexahedrite (IIAB). Found 1971. Tkw = 58.67kg.
This is another piece of that meteorite that was used as a dog food bowl on a ranch in Mexico. They had large dogs that would drag off (and hide/lose) regular bowls. Of course, with the money they got from selling us this meteorite, they were able to come up with an alternate working solution (who knows? Maybe they are using a big hammered copper nugget these days). This piece came to Fredric through me some years ago (it has a copy of the old made on a physical typewrite info card I made when I first had this meteorite with it). This piece is most certainly one of the ones I sold for Jim Schwade some years ago. Somehow, I think Fredrick had something of a moisture issue in his house (even though it was in Tucson). Not sure if it was a hot tub, fish tank, or what but many of the iron meteorites I got from him show some rusting (see the NWA 11446 slices pictured in the last offering and the Seymchan below). For some reason, ALL of these things were completely uncoated. I know, some years ago, some people were saying “never coat a meteorite, that will just seal in moisture”. I call Bulldink on that. Dry the thing first and it won’t be a problem. I have done actual tests (uncoated, coated, waxed….) and found that coating a meteorite that has lots of iron in it a huge benefit. Of what I have gotten from Fredrick and or Timothy, this is, by far, the most oxidized. However, in this case, it has done something kind of amazing. The rust on this piece is thin (not the type that would promote further rusting risking the piece. More of a medium grade surface coating) but I decided to not clean this because of what this coating of oxidation has done. Somehow, this has brought out the Nuemann lines unlike ANY meteorite I have ever seen. I remember the cut and polished face that was on the meteorite when we bought it showed these really well. Unfortunately, that cut was oriented really awkward for further cutting so we cut it in a different direction. Unfortunately, that direction made the Nuemann lines barely visible no matter how much effort Marlin put into etching this stuff. Here, they are super strong and vibrant – the best I have ever seen. It would be really easy to polish off this oxide coating, if that is what someone really wants but no amount of fiddling with etching will bring this structure back to life after. I have spray coated this meteorite to keep it long term protected from further oxidation (but still, DON’T put it next to the shower, hot tub or fish tank PLEASE).
342.1 gram part slice – 120mm x 70mm x 5mm - $1400

NWA (8262): L-Melt breccia. Found 2013. Tkw = 1226grams.
Not all that long ago, this would have been a very expensive meteorite. I think the firsts of this type I saw were cat Mountain, AZ ($100 hundred +/gram I think) and Chico, New Mexico (a lot cheaper but you had to buy a pretty big piece to get both textures). This slice reminds me of a miniature Chico. About ¾ of the piece is highly shocked/ distorted chondritic material (that has a lot of vesicles in it – just like Chico) and the remaining ¼ is obvious flow melt material. Unlike Chico though, this is a nice hold in the palm of your hand complete slice. This piece is in a Riker type box (maybe not in the group photo though) that comes with a WWMeteorites.com label.
30.5 gram complete slice – 70mm x 45mm x 3mm - $95

NWA (17418). HED achondrite (Diogenite). Found 2024. Tkw = 4.88kg.
This is a nice end piece with a cool shape. This meteorite reminds me strongly of Dhofar (700). It has the same solid crystalline composition (looking kind of like a greenish Ureilite more than a Diogenite). Mixed in this are some dark (nearly black( inclusions (likely chromite). The back side is all clearly old exterior, no fresh breaks or modifications. There are a good number of black shiny areas that look like crust but I suspect that these are actually wind-polished chromites. This piece is in a Riker.
20.3 gram end piece – 55mm x 24mm x 10mm - $220

NWA (8022): Lunar meteorite (feldspathic breccia). Found 2013. Tkw = 1226 grams.
This is a specimen that required me running it on the XRF to be sure it was not something that accidentally mislabeled. Nope, this is indeed a moon rock. However, it has something of a different look to it than most. To be honest, this looks a LOT like many eucrites/ howardites I have seen. This even has a lot of small brown spots scattered all through it (which are likely oxidized iron meteorite bits that got mixed into this from impacts while sitting on the moon) – making it look even more like an HED. This is a nice end piece that has some obvious smooth greenish gray fusion crust on the back. This Stephan specimen is very well priced and I have thought of buying it myself to cut up and offer to collectors as it has a different look to it than Lunars I have sold in the past.
71.0 gram end piece – 50mm x 23mm x 30mm - $1800

SEYMCHAN, Russia: (Pallasite). Found 1967.
This is actually one of the all iron pieces. Given its thickness, I suspect that this is one of the earlier sold specimens. When this stuff cfirst came out, the Russians were doing the cutting as they wanted the “value added” by turning the stuff into slices (could get a lot higher $/g for something that isn’t a hundreds of kilos chunk). The problem was that they were cutting the pieces to something on an awkward thickness. They were, generally, seen as too thick by collectors but they were thin enough that there really wasn’t an easy/ safe way to split them into thinner slices (that was before wire saws. A wire saw can probably cut this piece into several thinner slices but it would cost a fairly shocking amount of money to get that done, unfortunately). This is really kind of a long bar with only one of its shorter edges being a natural surface. This piece has been etched on both sides and does show a good etch structure. This was another Stephan piece that was uncoated. Like the others, this does show some (very minor) surface discoloration from oxidation (limited to one side). This could be completely renewed by someone that actually knows how to etch (don’t look at me, I really suck at etching). Frankly, it is safe (now coated) staying the way it is. This comes with a Matt Stream “Streaming Meteorites” label. This is priced well below what the Russians would charge for a similar piece these days.
523.5 gram part slice – 140mm x 50mm x 9mm - $780.

Shipping:
PLEASE NOTE-
 USPS POSTAL RATES HAVE INCREASED BY ABOUT 8% ABOVE THE COSTS LISTED BELOW A CUSTOM QUOTE ON SHIPPING MAY BE REQUIRED.

US:
I have indeed found that even my smallest jewelry box in a padded envelope now costs a minimum of $8 to send now. I know that there is yet a further shipping rate increase in the works. I have heard that package shipping rates will be going up (or may have already) another 8% or so. I won’t work about this until I actually see/ experience it. So, for JUST now, basic shipping will be $8. For small priority flat-rate boxes $12 should be fine. For things that are not light or small and won’t even fit in a small Priority flat-rate box I’ll probably need to custom quote the shipping.

OVERSEAS:
It has been some time since I have sent anything out of the US. With all the hassles and paperwork these days, that us something of a blessing. At this point, anything going overseas, I will need to look up shipping costs. However, the last packages I sent out of the US were about $17 for my basic small/ cheap specimen in a padded envelope to Canada and around $25 going to Europe. For small priority flat-rate boxes I think it was around $30 to Canada and around $45 to Europe.

Friday, 17 April 2026

BLAINE REED METEORITES FOR SALE- LIST #284 17APR2026

Blaine Reed Meteorites
P.O. Box 1141, Delta, CO 81416
Ph/fax (970) 874-1487
brmeteorites@yahoo.com

LIST 284 - April 14, 2026

Dear CollectorsI know, it has been a looong time since I have sent out any kind of e-mail offering. I have been busy with all kinds of things. Most things simply pop up as I go through each day (and eat up a surprising amount of my time). Others are longer term that I try and chip away at (with varying degrees of success) when I can. I got back from Costa Rica recently. I had hoped to chip at one of my largest issues while there, but it was not to be, unfortunately. I had hoped to get a membership with one of the “private” hospitals in San Jose. Then I was going to get scans to see what can be done about my hip and back. The hip I know- it has to be replaced. I completely wore it out with all the mountain climbing and hiking I did (way over did) over the years. However, the back is a fairly new thing. I suspect those problems are from my right leg now being a bit shorter than the left (no cartilage left in the right hip means that leg is a tiny bit shorter now which means lower back is out of alignment which means – endless pain and numbness in my back and left leg).
Kevin had lined up a hospital that had a very highly rated doctor for these things for me BUT we found that the rules had changed. It once was pay the yearly membership ($250 range, payable on the spot in cash, if you like) and you could immediately get scans (if the equipment was not being used at that moment) and the doc would get back to you with diagnosis and options for fixing. Nope, now you have to pay with a credit card (and they will NOT tell you what the membership cost is – just that it will be billed monthly and you will know the amount when you get your bill (!!!!!). An appointment for scans will then have to be made – A minimum of 2 weeks in advance and THEN someone might get back to you. Oh, they will only accept message from and send message to you through “Whatsapp” no phone, email or ANY other form of communication accepted or available. BOTH private hospitals have gone to these new ways. As such, neither I nor Kevin signed up for their services. So, it seems I am back to local doctors fighting with stubborn (“you are too young to need hip replacement, so we won’t cover it”) insurance companies to hopefully get back to actually walking like a human, rather than more like a zombie for me.

Anyway, the things listed here are all things I brought home from Tucson. These are all consignment items that will be returned to their owners if they don’t sell here. Not a huge rush, but do try and let me know if there is something you are interested in (even if you need to wait some time before actually being able to take it) fairly soon so I can be sure to keep it in my hands for now. Many (most actually) of these things are actually from Fredric Stephan. Well, actually his brother now. I was shocked to hear that Fredric passed away not that long ago. I enjoyed seeing him at the Tucson show each year and he usually had some really neat things for me to sell for him. Sad to lose one of our own but it is something we have to accept (not happily though). I will have at least 2 of these offerings that contain things of his and hope to work with Tim (his brother) to be able to offer more in the future.

A note about the photos:
Usually, I take the pictures for these offerings outside in natural sunlight. I was not able to do this this time. I delayed putting this offering together and sending it by days waiting for usable weather. We have been in an endless run of either overcast/ cloudy or very windy (and often, like right now, both). On the few days we did have sun at the proper times (midday is best) we had strong winds (like 30+mph) even in the mornings. Weather reports said we’d have this for the foreseeable future as well. I finally gave up and had these pictures taken inside. The light is less strong as a result but the biggest issue is that the light has been filtered through a “low –E” window. This gives the light something of a green undertone. Probably not a big deal for the particular items photographed on this list but it is something I figured people should know.



ARROYO AGUIAR, Argentina: (H5). Fell Summer 1950. Tkw = 7.45kg.
This is a Fredric Stephan specimen. To be honest, I was surprised that this is a fall. It does have some fresh metal in a largely medium to dark brown matrix but, overall, has a more aged look to it. The story on this says it was picked up “soon after” the fall. It was found some 50cm deep in the ground when the rancher who saw it fall finally located just where it had hit. Maybe “soon” was not as soon as we’d normally expect and maybe the ground was very wet. I did look into this meteorite a bit and found that this slice perfectly matches all of the other pieces of this meteorite I could find pictures of (including some with famous museum/ institution labels) so I know that this is NOT a case of the wrong sample getting put with the wrong specimen. I don’t recall having much of this go through my hands before. Whatever may have would have been small and only a specimen or two total – nothing that I have ever had enough of to be memorable.
56.8 gram slice – 65mm x 55mm x 5mm - $580

GIBEON, Namibia Fine octahedrite (IVA).
These pieces are actually from Al Mitterling. I probably would have sold some of these if I had put them out in Tucson. I did sell a couple similar pieces as those were what I had room for in the display case. I had forgotten that I even had these “extra” pieces until I found them while packing to go home (after Al had already left town). These are all basically blocks/ bookend type pieces and are quite nice. Most of these have one natural face. All other surfaces are cut and etched. These days, it is not terribly common to see any Gibeon available and, when it is, the etched pieces are surprisingly expensive (like $6 to $10/g). If you would like a well-priced little Gibeon paperweight, here is a good chance.
a) 34.9g – one natural face – 24mm x 16mm x 13mm - $140
b) 35.9g block – 21mm x 18mm x 12mm - $145
c) 39.4g one natural face – 24mm x 18mm x 15mm - $160
d) 69.1g one large natural face – 29mm x 22mm x 18mm - $260

NEW CONCORD, Ohio: (L6). Fell May 1, 1860.
I am really surprised that these 2 (Stephan specimens) did not sell in Tucson. To be honest, they are not real large and I did have my room pretty full (as were all of the cases) so they probably did not stand out as well as they should have. Anyway, these are both nice, small, fresh specimens of this fall. The smaller piece has a nice patch of fusion crust along one edge. Both look like that came from Ruben Garcia at some point. They both have labels, but only one still has the “ Mr.Meteorite.com” along the bottom.
a) 1.12g slice with crust – 11mm x 6mm x 5mm - $75
b) 1.76g slice – 15mm x 8mm x 5mm - $80

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana: (H5). Fell November 23, 2003. Tkw = 19.256kg.
This is (for this meteorite) a fairly large natural fragment. It has thick crust covering one side. This piece does show some “weathering” but only in so much as it had once it was found. The main mass of this meteorite was not found until considerable time after the fall. The owner of the home that it fell (completely) through was convinced that it was only powder and crumbs (what was found scattered about each of the floors the thing passed through during the fall) that had made the clear (and fairly large) holes through things (where have I heard this before? I am thinking Carancas (which was never fully investigated) and Chelyabinsk where it was believed (until they pulled up a nearly half ton piece) the mere “air blast” have blown a large hole on the ice covering a lake). It was some days/ week or two before someone was allowed to go under the house and inspect things. Yes, a good sized (footballish?) sized meteorite was buried in the dirt under the house. Unfortunately, it had broken a pipe(I won’t mention exactly what kind of pipe here) such that it was covered in “water” the entire time until it was recovered. As such, this does show some orange rust staining (but not a lot, thankfully).
18.3g fragment with crust – 30mm x 20mm x 18mm - $1800

NWA (7609): HED achondrite (eucrite). Found 2012. Tkw = 249 grams.
This is actually a nice complete slice of a fairly typical unbrecciated basaltic eucrite. To be honest, this thing looks very much like a slice of Camel Donga color and texture wise. However, this is missing the multi millimeter iron blobs that Camel Dongas often have (which can make them difficult to cut nicely). This has nice black crust around all but about 5mm of the edge. This comes in a plastic display box and has an A. Bates Meteorite Collection Label with it.
10.0gram complete slice – 55mm x 30mm x 2mm - $75



NWA (11446): Iron. Hexahedrite (IIAB). Found 2015. Tkw = 13kg.
This one was something of a mystery. I had these (both directly from Fredric and from Tim later) labeled as “Agoudal”. Did not think much of it. Agoudal is also a similar type meteorite (and I had never had a piece big enough to cut and etch). It was Jason Utas that looked at these pieces in Tucson and knew they were “something different”. He came up with the proper ID on these. We were wondering how the confusion came about. I think I know. Years ago, I was offered a “large” (really large for this meteorite) piece of Agoudal. I didn’t really have a need (or the $) for it so I kind of dropped it. I was later told that this had been cut into slices and etched (I think that was the next Tucson). I DID want some of those pieces. However, they had all sold by the time I was able to get over to see the person that had them. The original piece, I seem to recall, was about 13kg. The slices (I got to see a couple, but they were already sold – just waiting for the buyer to come pick them up) looked much like these. Personally, I am very surprised that this was figured out to be a different meteorite. I was shown a nice “large” slice of genuine Agoudal and it does look different. The detailed chemistry though shows that these two are not related. Good catch on someone’s part. Anyway, I have 2 each slices and end pieces. The price is the same as it was when these were “just” Agoudal specimens.
a) 293.7 gram complete slice – 135mm x 85mm x 4mm - $590
b) 359.1 gram complete slice – 210mm x 75mm x 4mm - $725
c) 447.9 gram end piece – 100mm x 70mm x 17mm - $900
d) 768.6 gram end piece – 125mm x 90mm x 20mm - $1500

Shipping:
NOTE- AS OF APRIL 26, 2026 THE USPS IS ICREASING PARCEL/POSTAL RATES BY 6-8% IN ADDITION TO THE QUOTE BELOW. 
US: It seems that shipping rates are going endlessly these days. Sometimes there is an excuse “holiday rush pricing” (that started in October and never did drop back down). Sometimes there is nothing. I noticed a couple weeks or so ago that now even the lightest of my packages (a small specimen in a small jewelry box in a padded envelope – only a bit over 2 ounces total) now costs a minimum of $8.10 to send “Ground Advantage”. Sending this EXACT package by priority is closer to $17 (!!!!). Obviously, it is better to use a small flat-rate box for most things these days (around $12). For things that are not light or small and won’t even fit in a small Priority flat-rate box I’ll probably need to custom quote the shipping.

OVERSEAS: 
NOTE- AS OF APRIL 26, 2026 THE USPS IS ICREASING PARCEL/POSTAL RATES BY 6-8% IN ADDITION TO THE QUOTE BELOW. 
It has been some time since I have sent anything out of the US. With all the hassles and paperwork these days, that us something of a blessing. At this point, anything going overseas, I will need to look up shipping costs. However, the last packages I sent out of the US were about $17 for my basic small/ cheap specimen in a padded envelope to Canada and around $25 going to Europe. For small priority flat-rate boxes I think it was around $30 to Canada and around $45 to Europe.